Donate Equity - UX Internship Case Study

A tool to help nonprofits accept business equity donations with confidence and clarity.

Project Overview

My Role: UX Design Intern (eventually led onboarding UX)

Team: 2 UX interns, Founder (initial starting team) + Lead UX Designer, Developer, 5 API & finance interns (as development continued)

Timeline: June 2024 – Present (Launch: July 2025)

Tools: Figma, Framer, Bubble, UserGuiding, HubSpot, Stripe

Deliverables: Wireframes, User Flows, Visual Design, Prototype, Onboarding UX

Impact: Signed nonprofit pre-launch, launch & podcast feature scheduled July 2025

“How can we make something as complex as equity donation feel approachable for any nonprofit?”

The Challenge

Business equity donations can be a game-changer for nonprofits—but the process is confusing, legal-heavy, and rarely completed without significant resources.

The Problem

  • Most nonprofits don’t have in-house legal teams.

  • Confusion around multi-stakeholder steps (boards, donors, foundations).

  • No dedicated tool exists to streamline this process.

Why solve it?

  • Enable more organizations to unlock equity-based funding.

  • Become the go-to infrastructure for complex nonprofit donations.

Chapter 1

Discovery

Research

We used both qualitative and quantitative methods to understand the needs of:

  • Nonprofits (our primary users)

  • Donors (equity holders)

  • Community Foundations (often act as facilitators)

Methods Used:

  • User interviews

  • Live walkthroughs of prototypes

  • In-app feedback/help forms


Key insight: Users didn’t need another project management tool—they needed guidance, clarity, and structure.

Chapter 2

Design Process

Together with the team, I helped:

  • Map out the entire donation journey

  • Identify where users needed collaboration, legal support, or document templates

  • Establish a repeatable task flow for donation processing

🗂 Insert flowchart or user journey image here

Ideation & User Flow

Wireframing

Early concepts focused on editable task lists, a dashboard, and upload features.

User feedback showed that customization added confusion—what users really wanted was to be guided.

Key Wireframe Decisions:

  • Pre-populated task list replaced editable checklists

  • Clear callouts for when to invite others (e.g. donor, team, board members)

  • Resource section for legal templates

📷 Insert wireframe gallery or before/after slider here

Prototyping with Bubble

Why Bubble?
Our team chose Bubble for its speed and flexibility—perfect for rapidly iterating based on feedback.

What I Worked On:

  • Prototyping necessary popups for when a user clicked on a task

  • Rapid iterations to designs based on Bubble’s limitations

  • Feedback loop from user demos directly to design iterations

Technical Challenge: We had to revise our popups and reusable elements due to lag and loading speeds. We prioritized a fast and seamless web experience at the cost of deleting some reusable elements.

🎥 Embed Bubble prototype walkthrough or link to live version


Visual Design

Once we brought on a lead UX designer, we:

  • Implemented a full design system in Figma

    • Faster designing to address feedback quicker

  • Chose brand colors that felt clean, calm, and supportive

    • Supported our goal of “simplifying” the donation process by presenting a simple image

  • Created reusable UI components for consistent styling across marketing and product

    • Assisted in presenting to potential investors and stakeholders

🎨 Insert UI mockups or “before/after design” block here



Onboarding & UserGuiding (My Lead Contribution)

After feedback revealed confusion, I led the integration of UserGuiding to create a smoother onboarding experience.

What I Did:

  • Designed segment-specific welcome videos (Donor, Nonprofit, Foundation)

  • Built interactive tooltips, task guides, and navigation helpers using video clips from our founder

  • Helped users feel seen, supported, and oriented

🎥 Insert clip or thumbnail of onboarding video


Chapter 3

User Testing & Iteration

Testing Methods:

  • Tested with stakeholders from nonprofits, foundations, and donors

  • Conducted 1-on-1 walkthroughs + remote testing

  • Collected feedback via forms and open-text emails

Changes We Made:

  • Added UserGuiding tooltips for better first-time navigation

  • Added features like "invite your board members"

  • Removed editable tasks that caused user hesitation